Ad is loading...
RCMTX vs VRRNX
RCMTX vs VRRNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCMTX vs. VRRNX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCMTX is a Hold and VRRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCMTX has more cash in the bank: 24.1B vs. VRRNX (126M). VRRNX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: VRRNX (1.28) vs RCMTX (0.65). RCMTX was incepted earlier than VRRNX: RCMTX (15 years) vs VRRNX (7 years). RCMTX (1.03) and VRRNX (1.01) have similar cost to investors . VRRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RCMTX (5.00). VRRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCMTX: VRRNX (0) vs RCMTX (250). VRRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. RCMTX (5.24). RCMTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.32 vs. VRRNX (31.72).
| RCMTX | VRRNX | RCMTX / VRRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.90 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.01 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.671 | -1.980 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.1B | 126M | 19,127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.28 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.24 | 6.24 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.11 | 19.45 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.32 | 31.72 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers