Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCMTX vs VRRNX
RCMTX vs VRRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCMTX vs. VRRNX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCMTX is a Hold and VRRNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCMTX has more cash in the bank: 27.6B vs. VRRNX (149M). VRRNX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: VRRNX (1.17) vs RCMTX (0.58). RCMTX was incepted earlier than VRRNX: RCMTX (16 years) vs VRRNX (7 years). RCMTX (1.03) and VRRNX (1.01) have similar cost to investors . VRRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RCMTX (5.00). VRRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCMTX: VRRNX (0) vs RCMTX (250). RCMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.69 vs. VRRNX (13.62). RCMTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.77 vs. VRRNX (33.55).
| RCMTX | VRRNX | RCMTX / VRRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.90 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.01 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.121 | 11.103 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.6B | 149M | 18,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.17 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.69 | 13.62 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.82 | 36.87 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.77 | 33.55 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement