Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCWCX vs WFBFX
RCWCX vs WFBFX Comparison
Open Charts RCWCX vs WFBFX
American Funds Capital World Bond R3
Price$16.26
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.81B
American Funds Capital World Bond F3
Price$16.28
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.87B
RCWCX vs WFBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCWCX vs. WFBFX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCWCX is a Hold and WFBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFBFX (9.87B) and RCWCX (9.81B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . WFBFX pays higher dividends than RCWCX: WFBFX (3.55) vs RCWCX (2.91). RCWCX was incepted earlier than WFBFX: RCWCX (23 years) vs WFBFX (8 years). RCWCX (1.13) is less costly to investors than WFBFX (0.48). RCWCX (251.00) and WFBFX (251.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFBFX: RCWCX (250) vs WFBFX (1000000). WFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. RCWCX (5.40). WFBFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.06 vs. RCWCX (-10.66).
| RCWCX | WFBFX | RCWCX / WFBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.48 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.48 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.112 | 5.342 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.81B | 9.87B | 99% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 3.55 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 6.02 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.29 | 1.88 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.66 | -8.06 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement