Ad is loading...
RDLCX vs RGACX
RDLCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts RDLCX vs RGACX
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$8.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.75M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
RDLCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLCX vs. RGACX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. RDLCX (262M). RGACX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: RGACX (0.08) vs RDLCX (0.00). RDLCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: RDLCX (18 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: RGACX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.58 vs. RDLCX (-5.25). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.87 vs. RDLCX (1.31).
| RDLCX | RGACX | RDLCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.94 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.94 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.818 | -2.667 | 293% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262M | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.25 | 2.58 | -203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.13 | 31.70 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.31 | 41.87 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.08 | 58.36 | -10% |