Ad is loading...
RDLCX vs RGAFX
RDLCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts RDLCX vs RGAFX
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$7.90
Change+$0.14 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.26M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$67.19
Change+$1.06 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
RDLCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. RDLCX (252M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: RGAFX (0.66) vs RDLCX (0.00). RDLCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: RDLCX (18 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: RGAFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.95 vs. RDLCX (-13.87). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.89 vs. RDLCX (0.52).
| RDLCX | RGAFX | RDLCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.34 | 532% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.34 | 565% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.744 | -9.715 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.66 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.87 | -4.95 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.17 | 7.58 | -108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.52 | 48.89 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.06 | 52.40 | -27% |