Ad is loading...
RDUFF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
SILV
Price
$10.18
Change
+$0.61 (+6.37%)
Updated
Nov 18, 03:36 PM (EDT)
123 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

RDUFF vs SILV

Header iconRDUFF vs SILV Comparison
Open Charts RDUFF vs SILVBanner chart's image
Radius Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.22K
CapitalizationN/A
SilverCrest Metals
Price$10.18
Change+$0.61 (+6.37%)
Volume$822
CapitalizationN/A
RDUFF vs SILV Comparison Chart
Loading...
SILV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RDUFF vs. SILV commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDUFF is a Hold and SILV is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (RDUFF: $0.06 vs. SILV: $9.57)
Brand notoriety: RDUFF and SILV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RDUFF: 10% vs. SILV: 352%
Market capitalization -- RDUFF: $9.54M vs. SILV: $976.55M
RDUFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.54M. SILV’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $976.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RDUFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSILV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RDUFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SILV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SILV is a better buy in the long-term than RDUFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SILV’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SILV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

RDUFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.18% price change this week, while SILV (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

SILV is expected to report earnings on Mar 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.08% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SILV($977M) has a higher market cap than RDUFF($9.54M). RDUFF has higher P/E ratio than SILV: RDUFF (18.80) vs SILV (8.62). SILV YTD gains are higher at: 46.107 vs. RDUFF (-55.154). SILV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 147M vs. RDUFF (-289.11K). SILV has more cash in the bank: 86M vs. RDUFF (3.48M). RDUFF has less debt than SILV: RDUFF (119K) vs SILV (288K). SILV has higher revenues than RDUFF: SILV (245M) vs RDUFF (0).
RDUFFSILVRDUFF / SILV
Capitalization9.54M977M1%
EBITDA-289.11K147M-0%
Gain YTD-55.15446.107-120%
P/E Ratio18.808.62218%
Revenue0245M-
Total Cash3.48M86M4%
Total Debt119K288K41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RDUFF vs SILV: Fundamental Ratings
RDUFF
SILV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
9738
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10027
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SILV's Valuation (67) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RDUFF (75) in the null industry. This means that SILV’s stock grew similarly to RDUFF’s over the last 12 months.

SILV's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDUFF (100) in the null industry. This means that SILV’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDUFF’s over the last 12 months.

SILV's SMR Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDUFF (97) in the null industry. This means that SILV’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDUFF’s over the last 12 months.

SILV's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDUFF (83) in the null industry. This means that SILV’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDUFF’s over the last 12 months.

SILV's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for RDUFF (100) in the null industry. This means that SILV’s stock grew significantly faster than RDUFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SILV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SILV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLMNX26.56-0.07
-0.26%
Harding Loevner International Eq Inv
DNREX14.48-0.04
-0.28%
Dunham Real Estate Stock N
BROCX17.97-0.11
-0.61%
BlackRock Advantage International Inv C
WTLVX15.55-0.11
-0.70%
Allspring Large Company Value R6
VNSAX21.88-0.37
-1.66%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select A

RDUFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDUFF and EDVMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDUFF and EDVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDUFF
1D Price
Change %
RDUFF100%
+5.81%
EDVMF - RDUFF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
GOTRF - RDUFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
SILV - RDUFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
GOLD - RDUFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
OBNNF - RDUFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SILV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILV has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILV jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILV
1D Price
Change %
SILV100%
-2.25%
PAAS - SILV
78%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
MAG - SILV
78%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
AG - SILV
72%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
CDE - SILV
71%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
AEM - SILV
70%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
More