Ad is loading...
RECAX vs RNWFX
RECAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts RECAX vs RNWFX
RBC Emerging Markets Ex-China Equity A
Price$12.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.73M
American Funds New World R5
Price$81.97
Change+$0.21 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
RECAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECAX vs. RNWFX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECAX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. RECAX (64.7M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than RECAX: RNWFX (1.15) vs RECAX (0.33). RECAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: RECAX (2 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). RECAX (2.62) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RECAX (38.00) and RNWFX (37.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RECAX: RNWFX (250) vs RECAX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.73 vs. RECAX (3.08).
| RECAX | RNWFX | RECAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.62 | 0.62 | 423% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.726 | 6.096 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 64.7M | 63.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.15 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.08 | 3.73 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 26.82 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 38.49 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.21 | 51.31 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers