Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
REMGX vs RNWBX
REMGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts REMGX vs RNWBX
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets C
Price$15.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.99M
American Funds New World R2
Price$83.35
Change+$0.05 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.95B
REMGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMGX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 68.9B vs. REMGX (88M). REMGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: REMGX (1.86) vs RNWBX (0.13). REMGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: REMGX (25 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). REMGX (5.23) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). REMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than REMGX: RNWBX (250) vs REMGX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. REMGX (8.23). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.82 vs. REMGX (20.56).
| REMGX | RNWBX | REMGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.23 | 1.67 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.028 | 13.324 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88M | 68.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 0.13 | 1,383% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.23 | 8.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.43 | 31.17 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.56 | 28.82 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.71 | 55.41 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers