Ad is loading...
REMKX vs RNWFX
REMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts REMKX vs RNWFX
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets R
Price$18.23
Change+$0.10 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.72M
American Funds New World R5
Price$79.31
Change+$0.25 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.36B
REMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMKX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.4B vs. REMKX (344M). REMKX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: REMKX (2.10) vs RNWFX (1.51). REMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: REMKX (24 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). REMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RNWFX (32.00). REMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: REMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). REMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.15 vs. RNWFX (8.40). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.02 vs. REMKX (-1.18).
| REMKX | RNWFX | REMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.704 | 2.653 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 344M | 63.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.51 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.15 | 8.40 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.11 | 0.55 | -1,465% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.18 | 15.02 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.04 | 50.52 | 38% |