REPO
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
SGSOF
Price
$101.21
Change
+$3.81 (+3.91%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

REPO vs SGSOF

Header iconREPO vs SGSOF Comparison
Open Charts REPO vs SGSOFBanner chart's image
National Asset Recovery
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30K
CapitalizationN/A
SGS SA
Price$101.21
Change+$3.81 (+3.91%)
Volume$650
CapitalizationN/A
REPO vs SGSOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
REPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGSOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
REPO vs. SGSOF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REPO is a Hold and SGSOF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (REPO: $0.02 vs. SGSOF: $101.21)
Brand notoriety: REPO and SGSOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: REPO: 331% vs. SGSOF: 1495%
Market capitalization -- REPO: $330.27K vs. SGSOF: $17.88B
REPO [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $330.27K. SGSOF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $17.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

REPO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGSOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • REPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGSOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGSOF is a better buy in the long-term than REPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

REPO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGSOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • REPO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SGSOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both REPO and SGSOF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

REPO (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SGSOF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.50% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGSOF($17.9B) has a higher market cap than REPO($330K). SGSOF YTD gains are higher at: 19.983 vs. REPO (-7.692). SGSOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.4B vs. REPO (-814.23K). SGSOF has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. REPO (11.5K). REPO has less debt than SGSOF: REPO (832K) vs SGSOF (4.39B). SGSOF has higher revenues than REPO: SGSOF (6.67B) vs REPO (181K).
REPOSGSOFREPO / SGSOF
Capitalization330K17.9B0%
EBITDA-814.23K1.4B-0%
Gain YTD-7.69219.983-38%
P/E RatioN/A25.32-
Revenue181K6.67B0%
Total Cash11.5K1.05B0%
Total Debt832K4.39B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
REPO vs SGSOF: Fundamental Ratings
REPO
SGSOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9348
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9599
SMR RATING
1..100
10012
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10043
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGSOF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as REPO (36). This means that SGSOF’s stock grew similarly to REPO’s over the last 12 months.

REPO's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as SGSOF (99). This means that REPO’s stock grew similarly to SGSOF’s over the last 12 months.

SGSOF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for REPO (100). This means that SGSOF’s stock grew significantly faster than REPO’s over the last 12 months.

REPO's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SGSOF (55). This means that REPO’s stock grew similarly to SGSOF’s over the last 12 months.

SGSOF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for REPO (100). This means that SGSOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than REPO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
REPOSGSOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
REPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGSOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REGRX16.750.44
+2.69%
Russell Inv Emerging Markets R6
HBLCX14.18N/A
N/A
Hartford Balanced Income C
BGIUX13.86-0.38
-2.68%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha 4
CCACX21.61-0.65
-2.92%
Calvert Mid-Cap C
MYIFX19.34-0.64
-3.20%
Monetta Young Investor Growth

REPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that REPO and COUR have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that REPO and COUR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REPO
1D Price
Change %
REPO100%
+3.23%
COUR - REPO
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.07%
RLXXF - REPO
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
RSKIA - REPO
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
SCTBF - REPO
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
SGSOF - REPO
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.92%
More

SGSOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGSOF and UDMY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGSOF and UDMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGSOF
1D Price
Change %
SGSOF100%
+3.92%
UDMY - SGSOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.50%
SGSOY - SGSOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
IKTSY - SGSOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
SDXOF - SGSOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLXXF - SGSOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
More