RFAC vs WAVS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFAC is a Hold and WAVS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RFAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWAVS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RFAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WAVS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RFAC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAVS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RFAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- WAVS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
RFAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -34.27% price change this week, while WAVS (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -18.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +3.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
RFAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 26, 2023.
WAVS is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+3.59% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| RFAC | WAVS | RFAC / WAVS | |
| Capitalization | 77.6M | 37.8M | 205% |
| EBITDA | -2.2M | -1.23M | 179% |
| Gain YTD | -34.612 | -8.622 | 401% |
| P/E Ratio | 540.50 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 4.07K | 303K | 1% |
| Total Debt | 793K | 202K | 393% |
| RFAC | WAVS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 16% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 13% | 16 days ago 4% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 13% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 14% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 26% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 29% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 36% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 24 days ago 9% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 12% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 27% | 16 days ago 8% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MNHCX | 25.85 | N/A | N/A |
| Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term L | |||
| WBVNX | 30.74 | N/A | N/A |
| William Blair Small Cap Value N | |||
| ACVIX | 10.94 | -0.11 | -1.00% |
| American Century Small Cap Value I | |||
| ARGYX | 8.73 | -0.12 | -1.36% |
| Invesco Global Real Estate Y | |||
| FWRTX | 10.31 | -0.15 | -1.43% |
| Fidelity Advisor Global Real Estate M | |||
RFAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFAC has been loosely correlated with RFACU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFAC jumps, then RFACU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFAC | 100% | -16.67% | ||
| RFACU - RFAC | 63% Loosely correlated | -8.17% | ||
| CLBR - RFAC | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| CSLM - RFAC | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BNIX - RFAC | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| WAVS - RFAC | 33% Poorly correlated | -11.52% | ||
More | ||||
WAVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAVS has been loosely correlated with RFAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WAVS jumps, then RFAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WAVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAVS | 100% | -11.52% | ||
| RFAC - WAVS | 49% Loosely correlated | -16.67% | ||
| GDSTU - WAVS | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| WAVSU - WAVS | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| IVCAU - WAVS | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RFACU - WAVS | 35% Loosely correlated | -8.17% | ||
More | ||||