It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RFACU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRRACF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RFACU’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRACF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
RFACU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RRACF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.63%.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
RFACU | RRACF | RFACU / RRACF | |
Capitalization | N/A | 358M | - |
EBITDA | -2.2M | -2.45M | 90% |
Gain YTD | 5.121 | 4.927 | 104% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 53.19 | - |
Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 4.07K | 70.7K | 6% |
Total Debt | 793K | 5.56M | 14% |
RFACU | RRACF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago3% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago8% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago11% | 2 days ago10% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago8% | 2 days ago9% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago12% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFACU has been loosely correlated with GATE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFACU jumps, then GATE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFACU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RFACU | 100% | N/A | ||
GATE - RFACU | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
DUETU - RFACU | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
RRACF - RFACU | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CSTAF - RFACU | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NVAC - RFACU | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRACF has been closely correlated with BYNOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RRACF jumps, then BYNOU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RRACF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RRACF | 100% | N/A | ||
BYNOU - RRACF | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
HAIUF - RRACF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
TETEU - RRACF | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
DUET - RRACF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
BUJA - RRACF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |