RFACU
Price
$12.42
Change
-$0.09 (-0.72%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
TETE
Price
$12.28
Change
+$0.25 (+2.08%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
74.7M
Ad is loading...

RFACU vs TETE

Header iconRFACU vs TETE Comparison
Open Charts RFACU vs TETEBanner chart's image
RF Acquisition
Price$12.42
Change-$0.09 (-0.72%)
Volume$22.77K
CapitalizationN/A
Technology & Telecommunication Acquisition
Price$12.28
Change+$0.25 (+2.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization74.7M
RFACU vs TETE Comparison Chart
Loading...
RFACU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TETE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RFACU vs. TETE commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFACU is a Hold and TETE is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (RFACU: $12.42 vs. TETE: $12.28)
Brand notoriety: RFACU and TETE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RFACU: 1875% vs. TETE: 1%
Market capitalization -- RFACU: $0 vs. TETE: $74.7M
RFACU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. TETE’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $74.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RFACU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTETE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RFACU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TETE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RFACU is a better buy in the long-term than TETE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RFACU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TETE’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RFACU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TETE’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RFACU is a better buy in the short-term than TETE.

Price Growth

RFACU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +7.63% price change this week, while TETE (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

TETE is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.19% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFACU YTD gains are higher at: 10.009 vs. TETE (-0.325). TETE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -990.87K vs. RFACU (-2.2M). TETE has more cash in the bank: 39.5K vs. RFACU (4.07K). RFACU has less debt than TETE: RFACU (793K) vs TETE (1.5M). RFACU (0) and TETE (0) have equivalent revenues.
RFACUTETERFACU / TETE
CapitalizationN/A74.7M-
EBITDA-2.2M-990.87K222%
Gain YTD10.009-0.325-3,083%
P/E RatioN/A390.00-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.07K39.5K10%
Total Debt793K1.5M53%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RFACUTETE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
7%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
5%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
15%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RFACU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TETE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ILESX18.200.21
+1.17%
Fisher IIG US Lrg Cp Eq Env & Scl Val
FGITX42.480.35
+0.83%
Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income M
LMPRX91.960.61
+0.67%
ClearBridge Growth R
RIGCX10.290.02
+0.19%
Victory RS International C
RAGHX28.12-0.20
-0.71%
Virtus KAR Health Sciences A

RFACU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFACU has been loosely correlated with CSLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFACU jumps, then CSLM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RFACU
1D Price
Change %
RFACU100%
-0.72%
CSLM - RFACU
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
PLMJU - RFACU
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
GATE - RFACU
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RENE - RFACU
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PLMJ - RFACU
37%
Loosely correlated
+5.21%
More

TETE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TETE has been loosely correlated with CLBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TETE jumps, then CLBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TETE
1D Price
Change %
TETE100%
+2.08%
CLBR - TETE
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
PLMJ - TETE
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.21%
RFACU - TETE
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
WAVSU - TETE
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPYA - TETE
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.19%
More