Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFATX vs VBMFX
RFATX vs VBMFX Comparison
Open Charts RFATX vs VBMFX
Russell Inv Investment Grade Bond S
Price$18.12
Change-$0.07 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index I
Price$9.57
Change-$0.04 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.01B
RFATX vs VBMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFATX vs. VBMFX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFATX is a Hold and VBMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VBMFX has more cash in the bank: 352B vs. RFATX (1.01B). RFATX pays higher dividends than VBMFX: RFATX (4.71) vs VBMFX (3.69). RFATX was incepted earlier than VBMFX: RFATX (18 years) vs VBMFX (39 years). RFATX (0.56) is less costly to investors than VBMFX (0.15). RFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. VBMFX (36.00). RFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than VBMFX: RFATX (0) vs VBMFX (3000). RFATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. VBMFX (0.52). RFATX return over 5 years is better than : -8.68 vs. VBMFX (-16.76).
| RFATX | VBMFX | RFATX / VBMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.15 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.15 | 373% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.783 | 1.371 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 352B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.71 | 3.69 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.87 | 0.52 | 740% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.10 | -0.40 | -2,019% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.68 | -16.76 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.79 | -9.19 | -63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers