Intraday BUY SELL Signals
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFEM vs UMC
RFEM vs UMC Comparison
Open Charts RFEM vs UMC
RFEM vs UMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFEM vs. UMC commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFEM is a Buy and UMC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UMC: Fundamental Ratings
UMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 44 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RFEM | UMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RFEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFEM has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFEM jumps, then SID could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFEM | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| SID - RFEM | 61% Loosely correlated | -8.04% | ||
| UMC - RFEM | 59% Loosely correlated | +10.66% | ||
| TSM - RFEM | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.94% | ||
| BABA - RFEM | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| JD - RFEM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||
UMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMC | 100% | +10.66% | ||
| LRCX - UMC | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.97% | ||
| KLAC - UMC | 57% Loosely correlated | +8.73% | ||
| AMAT - UMC | 55% Loosely correlated | +4.08% | ||
| GFS - UMC | 51% Loosely correlated | +6.44% | ||
| ACLS - UMC | 51% Loosely correlated | +6.89% | ||
More | ||||