Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFGTX vs SSAKX
RFGTX vs SSAKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.6B vs. SSAKX (3.09B). SSAKX pays higher dividends than RFGTX: SSAKX (1.97) vs RFGTX (1.51). RFGTX was incepted earlier than SSAKX: RFGTX (16 years) vs SSAKX (3 years). SSAKX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RFGTX (0.36). SSAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RFGTX (6.00). SSAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFGTX: SSAKX (0) vs RFGTX (250). RFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. SSAKX (9.61).
| RFGTX | SSAKX | RFGTX / SSAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.59 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.65 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.776 | 8.246 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.6B | 3.09B | 1,540% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.97 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 9.61 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.31 | 30.42 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.49 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement