Ad is loading...
RFGTX vs SSAKX
RFGTX vs SSAKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFGTX has more cash in the bank: 44.6B vs. SSAKX (2.9B). SSAKX pays higher dividends than RFGTX: SSAKX (2.05) vs RFGTX (1.58). RFGTX was incepted earlier than SSAKX: RFGTX (16 years) vs SSAKX (3 years). SSAKX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RFGTX (0.36). SSAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RFGTX (6.00). SSAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFGTX: SSAKX (0) vs RFGTX (250). RFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. SSAKX (8.10).
| RFGTX | SSAKX | RFGTX / SSAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.59 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.67 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.800 | 2.236 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.6B | 2.9B | 1,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 2.05 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.02 | 8.10 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.56 | 14.99 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.68 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.25 | N/A | - |