Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFGTX vs TLZIX
RFGTX vs TLZIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFGTX vs. TLZIX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFGTX is a Hold and TLZIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFGTX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. TLZIX (11B). TLZIX pays higher dividends than RFGTX: TLZIX (2.10) vs RFGTX (1.43). RFGTX was incepted earlier than TLZIX: RFGTX (16 years) vs TLZIX (16 years). RFGTX (0.36) is less costly to investors than TLZIX (0.17). TLZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. RFGTX (6.00). RFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TLZIX: RFGTX (250) vs TLZIX (1000000). TLZIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.23 vs. RFGTX (11.88). TLZIX return over 5 years is better than : 54.72 vs. RFGTX (39.11).
| RFGTX | TLZIX | RFGTX / TLZIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.10 | 360% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.17 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.840 | 12.944 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7B | 11B | 443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 2.10 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.88 | 13.23 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.17 | 45.56 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 54.72 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.42 | 133.89 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers