Ad is loading...
RGABX vs WPCSX
RGABX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$64.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$46.17
Change-$0.10 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.35M
RGABX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. WPCSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a StrongBuy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. WPCSX (722M). RGABX (0.00) and WPCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGABX (23 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGABX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.45 vs. WPCSX (-6.07). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 35.95 vs. WPCSX (21.06).
| RGABX | WPCSX | RGABX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.75 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.75 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.815 | 0.675 | -417% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286B | 722M | 39,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.45 | -6.07 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.15 | 12.74 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.95 | 21.06 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.42 | 64.78 | 75% |