Ad is loading...
RGACX vs RRGSX
RGACX vs RRGSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs RRGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$67.33
Change-$2.51 (-3.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.57B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock R
Price$86.34
Change-$3.60 (-4.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.59B
RGACX vs RRGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. RRGSX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and RRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 287B vs. RRGSX (47.6B). RGACX pays higher dividends than RRGSX: RGACX (0.08) vs RRGSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than RRGSX: RGACX (23 years) vs RRGSX (22 years). RRGSX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRGSX: RGACX (250) vs RRGSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.66 vs. RRGSX (2.13). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 47.01 vs. RRGSX (36.65).
| RGACX | RRGSX | RGACX / RRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.18 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.18 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.987 | -5.466 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287B | 47.6B | 603% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.66 | 2.13 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.08 | 21.49 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.01 | 36.65 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.74 | 72.00 | 89% |