Ad is loading...
RGAFX vs WPCSX
RGAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$72.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$46.17
Change-$0.10 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.35M
RGAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a StrongBuy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. WPCSX (722M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGAFX (0.65) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGAFX (23 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.45 vs. WPCSX (-6.07). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.83 vs. WPCSX (21.06).
| RGAFX | WPCSX | RGAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.75 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.75 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.459 | 0.675 | -365% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286B | 722M | 39,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.45 | -6.07 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.96 | 12.74 | 267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.83 | 21.06 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.63 | 64.78 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers