Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WLGCX
RGAGX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.15
Change+$0.74 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.41B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$25.68
Change+$0.19 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
RGAGX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WLGCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 322B vs. WLGCX (8.07B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: RGAGX (0.60) vs WLGCX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGAGX (16 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGAGX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.23 vs. WLGCX (15.16). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.61 vs. WLGCX (18.29).
| RGAGX | WLGCX | RGAGX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.64 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.74 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.877 | 5.592 | 230% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322B | 8.07B | 3,992% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.23 | 15.16 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.16 | 23.46 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.61 | 18.29 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.31 | 50.26 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement