Ad is loading...
RGCEX vs RNPFX
RGCEX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts RGCEX vs RNPFX
Columbia Select Global Equity C
Price$14.66
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets691.22M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$60.87
Change-$0.25 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.06B
RGCEX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGCEX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGCEX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. RGCEX (691M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than RGCEX: RNPFX (0.80) vs RGCEX (0.00). RGCEX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: RGCEX (25 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). RGCEX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RGCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGCEX: RNPFX (250) vs RGCEX (2000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.32 vs. RGCEX (-5.65). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 68.96 vs. RGCEX (35.27).
| RGCEX | RNPFX | RGCEX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.46 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.46 | 439% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.457 | -1.886 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 691M | 138B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.80 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.65 | 1.32 | -428% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.45 | 3.28 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.27 | 68.96 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.61 | 63.90 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers