RGLG
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.03 (-30.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
47.05K
WHLT
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Jan 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.43M
Ad is loading...

RGLG vs WHLT

Header iconRGLG vs WHLT Comparison
Open Charts RGLG vs WHLTBanner chart's image
UHF Logistics Group
Price$0.07
Change-$0.03 (-30.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization47.05K
Chase Packaging
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$979
Capitalization1.43M
RGLG vs WHLT Comparison Chart
Loading...
RGLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLG vs. WHLT commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLG is a Hold and WHLT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (RGLG: $0.07 vs. WHLT: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: RGLG and WHLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLG: 61% vs. WHLT: 16%
Market capitalization -- RGLG: $47.05K vs. WHLT: $1.43M
RGLG [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $47.05K. WHLT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHLT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHLT is a better buy in the long-term than RGLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGLG’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHLT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGLG’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WHLT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHLT is a better buy in the short-term than RGLG.

Price Growth

RGLG (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -10.64% price change this week, while WHLT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

WHLT is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.19% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHLT($1.43M) has a higher market cap than RGLG($47.1K). WHLT YTD gains are higher at: 35.714 vs. RGLG (-26.425). WHLT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -53.86K vs. RGLG (-3.54M). WHLT has more cash in the bank: 432K vs. RGLG (17.4K). RGLG has higher revenues than WHLT: RGLG (220K) vs WHLT (0).
RGLGWHLTRGLG / WHLT
Capitalization47.1K1.43M3%
EBITDA-3.54M-53.86K6,569%
Gain YTD-26.42535.714-74%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue220K0-
Total Cash17.4K432K4%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLG vs WHLT: Fundamental Ratings
RGLG
WHLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
10020
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6165
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a13

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLG's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (59). This means that RGLG’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

RGLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (100). This means that RGLG’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGLG (100). This means that WHLT’s stock grew significantly faster than RGLG’s over the last 12 months.

RGLG's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (65). This means that RGLG’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

RGLG's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (100). This means that RGLG’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGLGWHLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RGLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTLCX78.690.62
+0.79%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed US Large Cap C
PHPPX12.560.09
+0.72%
Principal MidCap Growth R5
LAVPX15.310.09
+0.59%
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
SHDYX10.490.01
+0.10%
American Beacon Shapiro SMID Cap Eq Y
SWHFX23.52-0.18
-0.76%
Schwab Health Care

RGLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGLG and RFACU have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGLG and RFACU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLG
1D Price
Change %
RGLG100%
-32.25%
RFACU - RGLG
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
CNDAU - RGLG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - RGLG
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBT - RGLG
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBAJ - RGLG
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WHLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHLT and SPKLU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHLT and SPKLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHLT
1D Price
Change %
WHLT100%
N/A
SPKLU - WHLT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTIIU - WHLT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTGC - WHLT
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
SITS - WHLT
12%
Poorly correlated
+9.91%
RGLG - WHLT
5%
Poorly correlated
-32.25%
More