RGLG
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
WHLT
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

RGLG vs WHLT

Header iconRGLG vs WHLT Comparison
Open Charts RGLG vs WHLTBanner chart's image
UHF Logistics Group
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.35K
CapitalizationN/A
Chase Packaging
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$7.92K
CapitalizationN/A
RGLG vs WHLT Comparison Chart
Loading...
RGLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLG vs. WHLT commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLG is a Hold and WHLT is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (RGLG: $0.09 vs. WHLT: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: RGLG and WHLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLG: 13% vs. WHLT: 243%
Market capitalization -- RGLG: $47.05K vs. WHLT: $1.43M
RGLG [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $47.05K. WHLT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHLT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLG is a better buy in the long-term than WHLT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGLG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHLT’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGLG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WHLT’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGLG is a better buy in the short-term than WHLT.

Price Growth

RGLG (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +51.67% price change this week, while WHLT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -15.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

WHLT is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.78% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHLT($1.43M) has a higher market cap than RGLG($47.1K). WHLT YTD gains are higher at: -29.515 vs. RGLG (-66.171). WHLT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -53.86K vs. RGLG (-3.54M). WHLT has more cash in the bank: 432K vs. RGLG (17.4K). RGLG has higher revenues than WHLT: RGLG (220K) vs WHLT (0).
RGLGWHLTRGLG / WHLT
Capitalization47.1K1.43M3%
EBITDA-3.54M-53.86K6,569%
Gain YTD-66.171-29.515224%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue220K0-
Total Cash17.4K432K4%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLG vs WHLT: Fundamental Ratings
RGLG
WHLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8893
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
10019
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3596
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLG's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (59). This means that RGLG’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

RGLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (100). This means that RGLG’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGLG (100). This means that WHLT’s stock grew significantly faster than RGLG’s over the last 12 months.

RGLG's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHLT (96). This means that RGLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

RGLG's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (100). This means that RGLG’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGLGWHLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RGLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USMIX21.65N/A
N/A
Victory Extended Market Index
IJEAX11.41-0.26
-2.23%
VY® JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity A
RGLAX23.40-0.65
-2.70%
American Funds Global Insight R-1
PRNEX36.53-1.11
-2.95%
T. Rowe Price New Era
KGLCX14.94-0.63
-4.05%
Kinetics Global Adv C

RGLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGLG and RFACU have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGLG and RFACU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLG
1D Price
Change %
RGLG100%
-1.91%
RFACU - RGLG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNDAU - RGLG
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
TGLO - RGLG
12%
Poorly correlated
-7.01%
SRBT - RGLG
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBAJ - RGLG
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WHLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHLT and SPKLU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHLT and SPKLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHLT
1D Price
Change %
WHLT100%
-15.79%
SPKLU - WHLT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTIIU - WHLT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTGC - WHLT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SITS - WHLT
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
RGLG - WHLT
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
More