Ad is loading...
RGSCX vs RSLBX
RGSCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLBX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$22.57
Change-$0.15 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.22M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$54.84
Change-$0.89 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.79B
RGSCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 72.8B vs. RGSCX (47.2M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than RGSCX: RSLBX (0.15) vs RGSCX (0.00). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: RGSCX (23 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. RSLBX (29.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLBX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.05 vs. RGSCX (-7.18). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.87 vs. RGSCX (-19.07).
| RGSCX | RSLBX | RGSCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.429 | -2.262 | -63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.2M | 72.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.18 | -2.05 | 349% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.25 | -3.16 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.07 | 14.87 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.24 | 26.36 | -160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...