Ad is loading...
RHGTX vs SWERX
RHGTX vs SWERX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RHGTX vs. SWERX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RHGTX is a Hold and SWERX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHGTX has more cash in the bank: 43.6B vs. SWERX (1.15B). SWERX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: SWERX (2.13) vs RHGTX (1.47). RHGTX was incepted earlier than SWERX: RHGTX (9 years) vs SWERX (20 years). SWERX (0.51) and RHGTX (0.50) have similar cost to investors . SWERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. RHGTX (6.00). SWERX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHGTX: SWERX (0) vs RHGTX (250). RHGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. SWERX (6.15). RHGTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.12 vs. SWERX (37.85).
| RHGTX | SWERX | RHGTX / SWERX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.51 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.836 | -0.613 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6B | 1.15B | 3,785% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 2.13 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 6.15 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.19 | 10.95 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.12 | 37.85 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...