Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RING vs SILJ
RING vs SILJ Comparison
Open Charts RING vs SILJ
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Price$42.48
Change+$1.15 (+2.78%)
Volume$5.41K
Net Assets1.46B
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
Price$12.84
Change+$0.07 (+0.55%)
Volume$6.37K
Net Assets1.13B
RING vs SILJ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RING vs. SILJ commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RING is a Buy and SILJ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RING has more net assets: 1.46B vs. SILJ (1.13B). RING has a higher annual dividend yield than SILJ: RING (47.529) vs SILJ (28.600). RING was incepted earlier than SILJ: RING (13 years) vs SILJ (12 years). RING (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than SILJ (0.69). SILJ has a higher turnover RING (18.00) vs RING (18.00).
| RING | SILJ | RING / SILJ | |
| Gain YTD | 47.529 | 28.600 | 166% |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 1.13B | 129% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.69 | 57% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 57.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 0.98 | 5.86 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RING | SILJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 16 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RING and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RING has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RING jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RING | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RING | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| AEM - RING | 93% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| WPM - RING | 89% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| NEM - RING | 87% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| AGI - RING | 84% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| DRD - RING | 80% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SILJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILJ has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILJ jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILJ | 100% | N/A | ||
| PAAS - SILJ | 90% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| HL - SILJ | 90% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| MAG - SILJ | 89% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AG - SILJ | 88% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| WPM - SILJ | 86% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||