RKHNF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
12.5M
RMLFF
Price
$0.65
Change
+$0.07 (+12.07%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
185.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RKHNF vs RMLFF

Header iconRKHNF vs RMLFF Comparison
Open Charts RKHNF vs RMLFFBanner chart's image
Rockhaven Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization12.5M
Rusoro Mining
Price$0.65
Change+$0.07 (+12.07%)
Volume$236.55K
Capitalization185.38M
RKHNF vs RMLFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RKHNF vs. RMLFF commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RKHNF is a Hold and RMLFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (RKHNF: $0.04 vs. RMLFF: $0.65)
Brand notoriety: RKHNF and RMLFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RKHNF: 219% vs. RMLFF: 313%
Market capitalization -- RKHNF: $12.5M vs. RMLFF: $185.38M
RKHNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.5M. RMLFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $185.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RKHNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMLFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RKHNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMLFF is a better buy in the long-term than RKHNF.

Price Growth

RKHNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.80% price change this week, while RMLFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +48.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.90% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLFF($185M) has a higher market cap than RKHNF($12.5M). RMLFF YTD gains are higher at: 12.696 vs. RKHNF (-14.800). RKHNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -760.57K vs. RMLFF (-6.06M). RKHNF has more cash in the bank: 1.99M vs. RMLFF (246). RKHNF has less debt than RMLFF: RKHNF (2.06M) vs RMLFF (35.3M). RKHNF (0) and RMLFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RKHNFRMLFFRKHNF / RMLFF
Capitalization12.5M185M7%
EBITDA-760.57K-6.06M13%
Gain YTD-14.80012.696-117%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.99M246808,537%
Total Debt2.06M35.3M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RKHNF vs RMLFF: Fundamental Ratings
RKHNF
RMLFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9326
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10044
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMLFF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RKHNF (92). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RKHNF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RKHNF (100). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RKHNF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RKHNF (100). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew similarly to RKHNF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as RKHNF (63). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew similarly to RKHNF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RKHNF (100). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew similarly to RKHNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWSHX64.420.33
+0.51%
American Funds Washington Mutual A
NEFSX43.29N/A
N/A
Natixis US Equity Opportunities A
FRETX31.34N/A
N/A
Franklin Equity Income C
HERIX10.59N/A
N/A
Hartford Emerging Markets Equity I
JEVRX9.23N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value Em Mkts Eq R6

RKHNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RKHNF and MMTMF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RKHNF and MMTMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RKHNF
1D Price
Change %
RKHNF100%
N/A
MMTMF - RKHNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.84%
TGMR - RKHNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-88.47%
RMLFF - RKHNF
11%
Poorly correlated
+10.77%
RVSDF - RKHNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-9.34%
RRDMF - RKHNF
4%
Poorly correlated
-44.00%
More

RMLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLFF and ORAAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLFF and ORAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLFF
1D Price
Change %
RMLFF100%
+10.77%
ORAAF - RMLFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.01%
GDRZF - RMLFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
BADEF - RMLFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.04%
GRCAF - RMLFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.43%
RKHNF - RMLFF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More