Ad is loading...
RLBFX vs SBACX
RLBFX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs SBACX
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.41
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.12B
Touchstone Balanced C
Price$27.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets901.64M
RLBFX vs SBACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. SBACX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Buy and SBACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. SBACX (902M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than SBACX: RLBFX (2.26) vs SBACX (0.65). RLBFX was incepted earlier than SBACX: RLBFX (23 years) vs SBACX (27 years). SBACX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). SBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: RLBFX (250) vs SBACX (2500). SBACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. RLBFX (4.53). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.35 vs. SBACX (34.48).
| RLBFX | SBACX | RLBFX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.78 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.78 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.441 | -1.875 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234B | 902M | 25,942% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 0.65 | 349% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.53 | 5.29 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.43 | 24.25 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.35 | 34.48 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.51 | 43.78 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...