Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WFAIX
RLBGX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WFAIX
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.52
Change+$0.33 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.74B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Admin
Price$40.80
Change+$0.29 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
RLBGX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WFAIX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WFAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. WFAIX (1.26B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBGX (2.13) vs WFAIX (1.00). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBGX (16 years) vs WFAIX (26 years). WFAIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFAIX (12.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBGX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.95 vs. WFAIX (0.19). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.21 vs. WFAIX (7.47).
| RLBGX | WFAIX | RLBGX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.90 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.04 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.078 | 5.578 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 254B | 1.26B | 20,127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.00 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.95 | 0.19 | 5,649% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.12 | 2.35 | 1,324% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.21 | 7.47 | 538% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.06 | 43.49 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement