Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WFALX
RLBGX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WFALX
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.20
Change+$0.12 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.84B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
Price$21.49
Change+$0.09 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
RLBGX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WFALX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WFALX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. WFALX (1.26B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBGX (2.13) vs WFALX (0.52). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBGX (16 years) vs WFALX (27 years). WFALX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFALX (12.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBGX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. WFALX (-8.20). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.06 vs. WFALX (-8.66).
| RLBGX | WFALX | RLBGX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.82 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.86 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.140 | 5.158 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 254B | 1.26B | 20,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.52 | 409% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.52 | -8.20 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.93 | -7.66 | -430% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.06 | -8.66 | -451% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.40 | 18.82 | 364% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement