Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLEFX vs TSAMX
RLEFX vs TSAMX Comparison
Open Charts RLEFX vs TSAMX
RLEFX vs TSAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. TSAMX (111M). TSAMX pays higher dividends than RLEFX: TSAMX (2.55) vs RLEFX (1.95). RLEFX was incepted earlier than TSAMX: RLEFX (11 years) vs TSAMX (4 years). TSAMX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). RLEFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. TSAMX (32.68). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSAMX: RLEFX (250) vs TSAMX (5000). RLEFX (13.43) and TSAMX (13.17) have marching annual gain over last year.
| RLEFX | TSAMX | RLEFX / TSAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.95 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.83 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.914 | 6.904 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 111M | 259,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 2.55 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.43 | 13.17 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.53 | 40.89 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.89 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LBWAX | 23.70 | 0.31 | +1.33% |
| BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A | |||
| OIEFX | 27.32 | 0.30 | +1.11% |
| JPMorgan Equity Income R2 | |||
| USLYX | 53.86 | 0.40 | +0.75% |
| JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R2 | |||
| BTIRX | 173.06 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| DWS Equity 500 Index R6 | |||
| JLCAX | 23.55 | -0.06 | -0.25% |
| JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus A | |||