Ad is loading...
RLVSX vs SMBAX
RLVSX vs SMBAX Comparison
Open Charts RLVSX vs SMBAX
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond S
Price$21.40
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.77B
Saratoga Municipal Bond A
Price$8.44
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets453.21K
RLVSX vs SMBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLVSX vs. SMBAX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLVSX is a Hold and SMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLVSX has more cash in the bank: 5.77B vs. SMBAX (453K). RLVSX pays higher dividends than SMBAX: RLVSX (3.55) vs SMBAX (0.83). RLVSX was incepted earlier than SMBAX: RLVSX (40 years) vs SMBAX (19 years). SMBAX (4.90) is less costly to investors than RLVSX (0.57). RLVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. SMBAX (36.00). RLVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMBAX: RLVSX (0) vs SMBAX (2500). RLVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. SMBAX (-0.37). RLVSX return over 5 years is better than : 1.10 vs. SMBAX (-3.65).
| RLVSX | SMBAX | RLVSX / SMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 4.90 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 4.90 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.819 | -1.517 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.77B | 453K | 1,273,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 0.83 | 430% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.70 | -0.37 | -459% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.01 | -1.52 | -329% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.10 | -3.65 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.34 | -11.83 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...