Ad is loading...
RLVSX vs SMBPX
RLVSX vs SMBPX Comparison
Open Charts RLVSX vs SMBPX
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond S
Price$21.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.78B
Saratoga Municipal Bond I
Price$8.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets452.55K
RLVSX vs SMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLVSX vs. SMBPX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLVSX is a Hold and SMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLVSX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. SMBPX (453K). RLVSX pays higher dividends than SMBPX: RLVSX (3.55) vs SMBPX (1.16). RLVSX was incepted earlier than SMBPX: RLVSX (40 years) vs SMBPX (31 years). SMBPX (4.49) is less costly to investors than RLVSX (0.57). RLVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. SMBPX (36.00). RLVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMBPX: RLVSX (0) vs SMBPX (250). RLVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. SMBPX (-0.47). RLVSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.18 vs. SMBPX (-2.48).
| RLVSX | SMBPX | RLVSX / SMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 4.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 4.49 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.911 | -1.484 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 453K | 1,275,717% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 1.16 | 306% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | -0.47 | -290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.92 | -0.59 | -668% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.18 | -2.48 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.65 | -9.27 | 7% |