Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMBKX vs TFIFX
RMBKX vs TFIFX Comparison
Open Charts RMBKX vs TFIFX
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.48 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.6M
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I
Price$44.54
Change+$0.21 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
RMBKX vs TFIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMBKX vs. TFIFX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBKX is a Hold and TFIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFIFX has more cash in the bank: 1.92B vs. RMBKX (198M). RMBKX (1.24) and TFIFX (1.19) have matching dividends . RMBKX was incepted earlier than TFIFX: RMBKX (26 years) vs TFIFX (9 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than TFIFX (0.79). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. TFIFX (46.90). RMBKX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFIFX: RMBKX (2500) vs TFIFX (500000). RMBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.98 vs. TFIFX (15.50). TFIFX return over 5 years is better than : 111.61 vs. RMBKX (75.02).
| RMBKX | TFIFX | RMBKX / TFIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.78 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.79 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.649 | 4.751 | -182% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 1.92B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.19 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.98 | 15.50 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.27 | 61.18 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.02 | 111.61 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.71 | N/A | - |