It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RMBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RMBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
RMBL (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +13.29% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Specialty Stores) price change was +0.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.87%.
RMBL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
RMBL | RUSHB | RMBL / RUSHB | |
Capitalization | 227M | 4.12B | 6% |
EBITDA | -55.9M | 737M | -8% |
Gain YTD | -67.035 | -2.579 | 2,599% |
P/E Ratio | 1.10 | 12.65 | 9% |
Revenue | 1.37B | 7.93B | 17% |
Total Cash | 58.9M | 184M | 32% |
Total Debt | 772M | 1.81B | 43% |
RMBL | RUSHB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 34 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHB's Valuation (27) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RMBL (40) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's SMR Rating (55) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBL (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBL (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.
RMBL | RUSHB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago50% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago89% | 9 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 2 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago45% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
UDEC | 35.67 | 0.27 | +0.76% |
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Dec | |||
GAM | 54.84 | 0.35 | +0.64% |
General American Investors Company | |||
CADNZD | 1.21 | N/A | N/A |
Canadian Dollar - New Zealand Dollar | |||
QULL | 47.08 | N/A | N/A |
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN | |||
MHF | 6.86 | -0.05 | -0.72% |
Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBL has been loosely correlated with CWH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMBL jumps, then CWH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMBL | 100% | +4.68% | ||
CWH - RMBL | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
AN - RMBL | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
SAH - RMBL | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
RUSHB - RMBL | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
HVT - RMBL | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More |