RMBL
Price
$1.79
Change
+$0.08 (+4.68%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
227.41M
60 days until earnings call
SAH
Price
$73.02
Change
+$1.49 (+2.08%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.94B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMBL vs SAH

Header iconRMBL vs SAH Comparison
Open Charts RMBL vs SAHBanner chart's image
RumbleOn
Price$1.79
Change+$0.08 (+4.68%)
Volume$80.8K
Capitalization227.41M
Sonic Automotive
Price$73.02
Change+$1.49 (+2.08%)
Volume$202.85K
Capitalization1.94B
RMBL vs SAH Comparison Chart
Loading...
RMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMBL vs. SAH commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBL is a StrongBuy and SAH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (RMBL: $1.79 vs. SAH: $73.02)
Brand notoriety: RMBL and SAH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMBL: 57% vs. SAH: 65%
Market capitalization -- RMBL: $227.41M vs. SAH: $1.94B
RMBL [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $227.41M. SAH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RMBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SAH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAH is a better buy in the long-term than RMBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAH is a better buy in the short-term than RMBL.

Price Growth

RMBL (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +13.29% price change this week, while SAH (@Specialty Stores) price change was +4.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

RMBL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

SAH is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+1.10% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAH($1.94B) has a higher market cap than RMBL($227M). SAH has higher P/E ratio than RMBL: SAH (11.30) vs RMBL (1.10). SAH YTD gains are higher at: 15.945 vs. RMBL (-67.035). SAH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 559M vs. RMBL (-55.9M). RMBL has more cash in the bank: 58.9M vs. SAH (28.9M). RMBL has less debt than SAH: RMBL (772M) vs SAH (3.86B). SAH has higher revenues than RMBL: SAH (14.4B) vs RMBL (1.37B).
RMBLSAHRMBL / SAH
Capitalization227M1.94B12%
EBITDA-55.9M559M-10%
Gain YTD-67.03515.945-420%
P/E Ratio1.1011.3010%
Revenue1.37B14.4B9%
Total Cash58.9M28.9M204%
Total Debt772M3.86B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBL vs SAH: Fundamental Ratings
RMBL
SAH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5223
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
9639
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10067
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAH's Valuation (29) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RMBL (40) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SAH’s stock grew similarly to RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

SAH's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SAH’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

SAH's SMR Rating (39) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBL (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SAH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

SAH's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBL (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SAH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

SAH's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBL (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SAH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMBLSAH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIKVX13.820.04
+0.26%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Z
BMCCX17.75N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv C
GPAFX57.57N/A
N/A
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha A
JNVSX18.59N/A
N/A
Jensen Quality Mid Cap J
FSYKX9.72N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable EM Eq C

RMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBL has been loosely correlated with CWH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMBL jumps, then CWH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBL
1D Price
Change %
RMBL100%
+4.68%
CWH - RMBL
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
AN - RMBL
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
SAH - RMBL
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
RUSHB - RMBL
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
HVT - RMBL
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
More

SAH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAH has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAH jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAH
1D Price
Change %
SAH100%
+2.08%
GPI - SAH
80%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
AN - SAH
79%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
PAG - SAH
78%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
ABG - SAH
78%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
LAD - SAH
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
More