Ad is loading...
RMBLX vs TFIFX
RMBLX vs TFIFX Comparison
Open Charts RMBLX vs TFIFX
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$48.11
Change-$0.07 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.7M
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I
Price$43.30
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
RMBLX vs TFIFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMBLX vs. TFIFX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBLX is a Buy and TFIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFIFX has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. RMBLX (205M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than TFIFX: RMBLX (1.51) vs TFIFX (1.26). RMBLX was incepted earlier than TFIFX: RMBLX (8 years) vs TFIFX (8 years). RMBLX (1.13) is less costly to investors than TFIFX (0.79). RMBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. TFIFX (46.90). RMBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFIFX: RMBLX (100000) vs TFIFX (500000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.47 vs. TFIFX (10.28). TFIFX return over 5 years is better than : 123.98 vs. RMBLX (95.42).
| RMBLX | TFIFX | RMBLX / TFIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.78 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.79 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.770 | 1.764 | -327% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 205M | 1.88B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.26 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.47 | 10.28 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.35 | 46.81 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.42 | 123.98 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |