Ad is loading...
RMBLX vs TFIFX
RMBLX vs TFIFX Comparison
Open Charts RMBLX vs TFIFX
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
Price$44.29
Change+$0.57 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.89M
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I
Price$39.83
Change+$0.18 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
RMBLX vs TFIFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMBLX vs. TFIFX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBLX is a Buy and TFIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFIFX has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. RMBLX (187M). RMBLX pays higher dividends than TFIFX: RMBLX (1.45) vs TFIFX (1.23). RMBLX was incepted earlier than TFIFX: RMBLX (8 years) vs TFIFX (8 years). RMBLX (1.13) is less costly to investors than TFIFX (0.82). RMBLX (49.00) and TFIFX (46.90) have comparable annual turnover. RMBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFIFX: RMBLX (100000) vs TFIFX (500000). RMBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. TFIFX (7.87). TFIFX return over 5 years is better than : 111.16 vs. RMBLX (91.51).
| RMBLX | TFIFX | RMBLX / TFIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.79 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.82 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.378 | -6.326 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 187M | 1.72B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.23 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.73 | 7.87 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.31 | 24.13 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.51 | 111.16 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...