RMCF
Price
$4.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 8, 6:59 PM EST
44 days until earnings call
SMPL
Price
$39.79
Change
-$0.58 (-1.44%)
Updated
Dec 8, 6:59 PM EST
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions RMCF vs SMPL

Header iconRMCF vs SMPL Comparison
Open Charts RMCF vs SMPLBanner chart's image
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
Price$4.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.68K
CapitalizationN/A
Simply Good Foods Company (The)
Price$39.79
Change-$0.58 (-1.44%)
Volume$205.43K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
RMCF vs SMPL Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
RMCF vs. SMPL commentary
Dec 10, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMCF is a Hold and SMPL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 10, 2023
Stock price -- (RMCF: $4.14 vs. SMPL: $39.79)
Brand notoriety: RMCF and SMPL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMCF: 66% vs. SMPL: 78%
Market capitalization -- RMCF: $25.84M vs. SMPL: $3.95B
RMCF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $25.84M. SMPL’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $3.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMPL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMPL is a better buy in the long-term than RMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMCF is a better buy in the short-term than SMPL.

Price Growth

RMCF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while SMPL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +131.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

RMCF is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2024.

SMPL is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.79% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for RMCF with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SMPL with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMPL($3.95B) has a higher market cap than RMCF($25.8M). SMPL has higher P/E ratio than RMCF: SMPL (29.67) vs RMCF (26.11). SMPL YTD gains are higher at: 4.628 vs. RMCF (-27.368). SMPL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 233M vs. RMCF (-3.83M). SMPL has more cash in the bank: 87.7M vs. RMCF (3.99M). RMCF has less debt than SMPL: RMCF (2.06M) vs SMPL (289M). SMPL has higher revenues than RMCF: SMPL (1.24B) vs RMCF (30M).
RMCFSMPLRMCF / SMPL
Capitalization25.8M3.95B1%
EBITDA-3.83M233M-2%
Gain YTD-27.3684.628-591%
P/E Ratio26.1129.6788%
Revenue30M1.24B2%
Total Cash3.99M87.7M5%
Total Debt2.06M289M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMCF vs SMPL: Fundamental Ratings
RMCF
SMPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10018
SMR RATING
1..100
9675
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1368
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMCF's Valuation (77) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SMPL (84) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that RMCF’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

SMPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMCF (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew significantly faster than RMCF’s over the last 12 months.

SMPL's SMR Rating (75) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as RMCF (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.

SMPL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as RMCF (63) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.

RMCF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMPL (68) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that RMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMCFSMPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFUS40.340.18
+0.46%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor US Eq ETF
TYG27.970.11
+0.39%
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp
QCLR25.480.10
+0.39%
Global X NASDAQ 100® Collar 95-110 ETF
REK19.770.06
+0.30%
ProShares Short Real Estate
XME54.010.10
+0.19%
SPDR® S&P Metals and Mining ETF

RMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCF and UTZ have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCF and UTZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMCF
1D Price
Change %
RMCF100%
+0.49%
UTZ - RMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
PLAG - RMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
THS - RMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
CENT - RMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
SMPL - RMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
More

SMPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPL has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPL jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMPL
1D Price
Change %
SMPL100%
-1.44%
MDLZ - SMPL
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
JJSF - SMPL
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
FLO - SMPL
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
POST - SMPL
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
THS - SMPL
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More