It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RMCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RMCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
RMCF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while SMPL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +131.59%.
RMCF is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2024.
SMPL is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2024.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
|RMCF||SMPL||RMCF / SMPL|
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
PRICE GROWTH RATING
P/E GROWTH RATING
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RMCF's Valuation (77) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SMPL (84) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that RMCF’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
SMPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMCF (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew significantly faster than RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
SMPL's SMR Rating (75) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as RMCF (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
SMPL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as RMCF (63) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
RMCF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMPL (68) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that RMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMPL’s over the last 12 months.
6 days ago76%
3 days ago60%
3 days ago65%
3 days ago66%
3 days ago67%
3 days ago75%
5 days ago69%
3 days ago63%
3 days ago70%
3 days ago69%
3 days ago67%
3 days ago67%
7 days ago67%
4 days ago72%
13 days ago75%
11 days ago66%
3 days ago66%
3 days ago64%
3 days ago56%
3 days ago51%
|ETFs / NAME||Price $||Chg $||Chg %|
|PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor US Eq ETF|
|Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp|
|Global X NASDAQ 100® Collar 95-110 ETF|
|ProShares Short Real Estate|
|SPDR® S&P Metals and Mining ETF|
A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCF and UTZ have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCF and UTZ's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPL has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPL jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.