Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs WFLVX
RMEBX vs WFLVX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WFLVX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
Allspring Large Company Value C
Price$14.15
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.67M
RMEBX vs WFLVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. WFLVX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and WFLVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. WFLVX (253M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than WFLVX: RMEBX (1.12) vs WFLVX (0.25). RMEBX was incepted earlier than WFLVX: RMEBX (11 years) vs WFLVX (17 years). WFLVX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). WFLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFLVX: RMEBX (250) vs WFLVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. WFLVX (-6.84). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. WFLVX (13.59).
| RMEBX | WFLVX | RMEBX / WFLVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.57 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.71 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.253 | 0.947 | 1,188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 253M | 43,874% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.25 | 453% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.26 | -6.84 | -164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.31 | 16.25 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.35 | 13.59 | 437% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.17 | -10.79 | -743% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement