Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WWIDX
RMFCX vs WWIDX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WWIDX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
Allspring Large Company Value Admin
Price$14.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244M
RMFCX vs WWIDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WWIDX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WWIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. WWIDX (244M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WWIDX: RMFCX (1.31) vs WWIDX (1.04). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WWIDX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WWIDX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and WWIDX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . WWIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWIDX: RMFCX (250) vs WWIDX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. WWIDX (-1.55). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.95 vs. WWIDX (17.29).
| RMFCX | WWIDX | RMFCX / WWIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.75 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.423 | 5.923 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 244M | 43,033% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.04 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | -1.55 | -545% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.47 | 15.59 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.95 | 17.29 | 295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.73 | -4.87 | -1,433% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement