Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs WWIDX
RMFCX vs WWIDX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WWIDX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.59
Change+$0.24 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.78B
Allspring Large Company Value Admin
Price$14.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.9M
RMFCX vs WWIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WWIDX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and WWIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. WWIDX (253M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WWIDX: RMFCX (1.27) vs WWIDX (0.96). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WWIDX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WWIDX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) and WWIDX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . WWIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWIDX: RMFCX (250) vs WWIDX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.49 vs. WWIDX (1.65). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.06 vs. WWIDX (29.92).
| RMFCX | WWIDX | RMFCX / WWIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.75 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.836 | 10.780 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 253M | 43,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.96 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.49 | 1.65 | 635% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.44 | 31.59 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.06 | 29.92 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.35 | -0.75 | -10,366% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement