Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMHYX vs SLDAX
RMHYX vs SLDAX Comparison
Open Charts RMHYX vs SLDAX
Russell Inv Long Duration Bond Y
Price$7.69
Change-$0.07 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets397.05M
SEI Long Duration Credit A (SIIT)
Price$7.56
Change-$0.07 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3B
RMHYX vs SLDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMHYX vs. SLDAX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMHYX is a Hold and SLDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLDAX has more cash in the bank: 3B vs. RMHYX (397M). SLDAX pays higher dividends than RMHYX: SLDAX (5.10) vs RMHYX (4.22). RMHYX was incepted earlier than SLDAX: RMHYX (6 years) vs SLDAX (13 years). SLDAX (0.37) is less costly to investors than RMHYX (0.34). SLDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RMHYX (49.00). SLDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMHYX: SLDAX (100000) vs RMHYX (10000000). RMHYX (1.09) and SLDAX (1.06) have marching annual gain over last year. RMHYX return over 5 years is better than : -10.42 vs. SLDAX (-20.59).
| RMHYX | SLDAX | RMHYX / SLDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.15 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.37 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.517 | 1.590 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 100000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 397M | 3B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.22 | 5.10 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.09 | 1.06 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.94 | -0.03 | -7,294% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.42 | -20.59 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement