Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMLPX vs SPMGX
RMLPX vs SPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMLPX vs. SPMGX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLPX is a Hold and SPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. SPMGX (1.1B). SPMGX (5.42) and RMLPX (5.20) have matching dividends . RMLPX was incepted earlier than SPMGX: RMLPX (8 years) vs SPMGX (6 years). SPMGX (3.36) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). SPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). SPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: SPMGX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). SPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.90 vs. RMLPX (9.95). SPMGX (250.64) and RMLPX (238.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMLPX | SPMGX | RMLPX / SPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 3.36 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 3.36 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.049 | 3.666 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 1.1B | 105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.20 | 5.42 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.95 | 17.90 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.38 | 101.00 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 238.63 | 250.64 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement