Ad is loading...
RMQCX vs UAPSX
RMQCX vs UAPSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UAPSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Hold and UAPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 734M vs. UAPSX (35.7M). UAPSX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UAPSX (0.59) vs RMQCX (0.31). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UAPSX: RMQCX (10 years) vs UAPSX (25 years). UAPSX (2.74) and RMQCX (2.71) have similar cost to investors . RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. UAPSX (46.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UAPSX: RMQCX (2500) vs UAPSX (15000). RMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -18.15 vs. UAPSX (-20.49). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 147.59 vs. UAPSX (47.28).
| RMQCX | UAPSX | RMQCX / UAPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 2.74 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 2.74 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.053 | -29.225 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 734M | 35.7M | 2,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.59 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.15 | -20.49 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.48 | -31.59 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 147.59 | 47.28 | 312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 601.68 | -0.08 | -749,529% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers