Ad is loading...
RMQCX vs UMPSX
RMQCX vs UMPSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UMPSX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Buy and UMPSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 693M vs. UMPSX (25.8M). RMQCX pays higher dividends than UMPSX: RMQCX (0.31) vs UMPSX (0.17). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UMPSX: RMQCX (10 years) vs UMPSX (25 years). RMQCX (2.71) and UMPSX (2.60) have similar cost to investors . RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. UMPSX (63.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMPSX: RMQCX (2500) vs UMPSX (15000). UMPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -22.91 vs. RMQCX (-24.62). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 135.57 vs. UMPSX (89.44).
| RMQCX | UMPSX | RMQCX / UMPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 2.60 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 2.60 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -22.982 | -26.844 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 25.8M | 2,686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.17 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.62 | -22.91 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.20 | -16.46 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.57 | 89.44 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 571.15 | 37.81 | 1,510% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers