Ad is loading...
RNWBX vs SMQFX
RNWBX vs SMQFX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SMQFX
American Funds New World R2
Price$79.46
Change+$1.71 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
SEI Emerging Markets Equity A (SIIT)
Price$10.06
Change+$0.19 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets760.15M
RNWBX vs SMQFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SMQFX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SMQFX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. SMQFX (760M). SMQFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SMQFX (3.83) vs RNWBX (0.14). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SMQFX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SMQFX (11 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SMQFX (1.01). SMQFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMQFX: RNWBX (250) vs SMQFX (100000). SMQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. RNWBX (2.17). SMQFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.59 vs. RNWBX (35.75).
| RNWBX | SMQFX | RNWBX / SMQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.64 | 261% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.01 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.710 | 6.129 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 760M | 8,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 3.83 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.17 | 5.19 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.63 | 20.67 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 37.59 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.98 | 18.81 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...