Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs RREMX
RNWHX vs RREMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs RREMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$86.49
Change+$1.79 (+2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.26B
RBC Emerging Markets Equity R6
Price$15.12
Change+$0.37 (+2.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.39B
RNWHX vs RREMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. RREMX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and RREMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.3B vs. RREMX (4.39B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than RREMX: RNWHX (1.04) vs RREMX (0.85). RNWHX was incepted earlier than RREMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs RREMX (9 years). RREMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RREMX (16.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RREMX: RNWHX (250) vs RREMX (250000). RREMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.12 vs. RNWHX (7.22). RREMX return over 5 years is better than : 37.27 vs. RNWHX (29.50).
| RNWHX | RREMX | RNWHX / RREMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.88 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.88 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.984 | 11.684 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.3B | 4.39B | 1,532% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.85 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.22 | 10.12 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.45 | 30.65 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.50 | 37.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement