Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs ZEMIX
RNWHX vs ZEMIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs ZEMIX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.87
Change-$0.48 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
American Beacon Ninety One Emr Mkts EqR5
Price$12.42
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets391.79M
RNWHX vs ZEMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. ZEMIX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and ZEMIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. ZEMIX (392M). ZEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: ZEMIX (1.26) vs RNWHX (0.99). RNWHX was incepted earlier than ZEMIX: RNWHX (10 years) vs ZEMIX (7 years). ZEMIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. ZEMIX (28.00). ZEMIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: ZEMIX (0) vs RNWHX (250). ZEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.77 vs. RNWHX (9.37). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 27.96 vs. ZEMIX (24.64).
| RNWHX | ZEMIX | RNWHX / ZEMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.85 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.09 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.588 | 16.510 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70B | 392M | 17,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.26 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.37 | 14.77 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.01 | 40.15 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.96 | 24.64 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |