Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ROFCX vs SSGSX
ROFCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ROFCX vs SSGSX
Royce Small-Cap Opportunity Consult
Price$11.79
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.29
Change+$0.15 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.36B
ROFCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ROFCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ROFCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.36B vs. ROFCX (1.04B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ROFCX: SSGSX (0.50) vs ROFCX (0.00). ROFCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ROFCX (19 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). ROFCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. ROFCX (35.00). ROFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ROFCX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). ROFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. SSGSX (-6.57). ROFCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.69 vs. SSGSX (14.10).
| ROFCX | SSGSX | ROFCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.26 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.26 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.506 | -4.932 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 5.36B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.34 | -6.57 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.69 | -7.36 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.69 | 14.10 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.67 | 12.75 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement