ROM
Price
$138.32
Change
+$2.60 (+1.92%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXL
Price
$115.86
Change
+$4.70 (+4.23%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
19.94B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ROM vs SOXL

ROM vs SOXL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) vs. Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL)

Key Takeaways

  • ROM provides 2x daily exposure to the broad S&P Technology Select Sector Index, while SOXL delivers 3x daily exposure to the narrower PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, creating distinct leverage and concentration profiles.
  • Both ETFs are leveraged products designed for short-term trading rather than long-term holding, with ROM offering moderately lower volatility than the higher-leverage SOXL.
  • ROM maintains broader technology sector diversification across approximately 80 holdings, whereas SOXL focuses intensely on semiconductors with roughly 30–50 holdings, leading to higher sector-specific risk in SOXL.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.95% for ROM and 0.75% (net) for SOXL, with both structures relying on derivatives such as swaps to achieve targeted daily multiples.
  • ROM’s top holdings emphasize large-cap technology leaders including NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, while SOXL’s concentration centers on semiconductor names such as NVDA, AMD, and MU.
  • In the current market environment, both funds serve tactical investors seeking amplified exposure to technology and semiconductor themes amid ongoing innovation cycles and capital expenditure trends.

Introduction

ROM and SOXL represent two distinct leveraged approaches to technology exposure. ROM targets twice the daily performance of a broad technology sector index, while SOXL seeks three times the daily return of a semiconductor-focused index. They do not compete directly as substitutes but instead offer investors alternative strategies for gaining amplified exposure within overlapping technology themes. This comparison highlights structural differences that matter for investors evaluating risk, cost, and thematic fit in a sector driven by semiconductor demand and broader digital transformation.

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) Overview

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index. The fund is a leveraged, passive ETF that uses derivatives including total return swaps to achieve its target multiple. It holds approximately 80 securities and maintains significant concentration in the largest technology companies. Top holdings typically include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, and other leaders in software, hardware, and semiconductors. Sector allocation is overwhelmingly weighted toward information technology. The expense ratio is 0.95%. Rebalancing occurs daily to maintain the 2x leverage target, introducing compounding effects over multi-day periods.

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) Overview

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. This leveraged ETF employs swaps and other derivatives to deliver the targeted multiple and holds roughly 30–50 positions concentrated in semiconductor companies. Prominent holdings generally feature NVDA, AMD, MU, and other chipmakers. Allocation is essentially 100% to the semiconductor industry. The net expense ratio is 0.75%. Daily rebalancing is required to reset leverage, which can lead to significant deviation from the stated multiple over longer holding periods.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology and semiconductor sectors continue to benefit from sustained demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure, advanced computing, and data center expansion. Capital expenditure by hyperscale cloud providers and ongoing innovation in chip design remain key catalysts. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and global supply chain dynamics influence investor sentiment. Regulatory developments around export controls and domestic semiconductor manufacturing incentives add complexity. Both ETFs operate within this environment, where sector momentum is driven by earnings growth in leading companies and broader adoption of emerging technologies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ROM has delivered amplified returns aligned with broad technology sector movements, reflecting its 2x structure and diversified holdings. SOXL has exhibited greater volatility due to its 3x leverage and concentrated semiconductor focus, amplifying both gains and losses during sector rotations or earnings-driven moves. Performance differences stem from leverage levels, index composition, and rebalancing mechanics. Investors using these products for tactical positioning must account for the impact of daily resets, which can cause returns to diverge substantially from the underlying index over periods longer than a single day.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest preference to ROM in the current environment. Its broader technology exposure, slightly lower leverage multiple, and established liquidity profile provide a comparatively balanced risk-adjusted approach to the sector relative to SOXL’s higher leverage and narrower semiconductor concentration. This assessment reflects observable factors including diversification, cost efficiency, and trend consistency rather than any guarantee of future outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ROM vs. SOXL commentary
Aug 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ROM is a Hold and SOXL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOXL has more net assets: 19.9B vs. ROM (1.23B). SOXL has a higher annual dividend yield than ROM: SOXL (164.478) vs ROM (43.963). ROM was incepted earlier than SOXL: ROM (20 years) vs SOXL (16 years). SOXL (0.75) has a lower expense ratio than ROM (0.95). SOXL has a higher turnover ROM (69.00) vs ROM (69.00).
ROMSOXLROM / SOXL
Gain YTD43.963164.47827%
Net Assets1.23B19.9B6%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.75127%
Turnover69.00250.0028%
Yield0.070.01778%
Fund Existence20 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ROMSOXL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ROM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORO20.871.23
+6.24%
Arrow Valtoro ETF
IWX112.950.65
+0.58%
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
BINV45.850.12
+0.26%
Brandes International ETF
ZFEB26.25N/A
-0.01%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrFeb
RHRX21.57-0.12
-0.57%
RH Tactical Rotation ETF

ROM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROM has been loosely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ROM jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROM
1D Price
Change %
ROM100%
-3.59%
MKSI - ROM
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.60%
GLW - ROM
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
MRVL - ROM
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.27%
GFS - ROM
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.37%
KEYS - ROM
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
More

SOXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXL has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXL jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOXL
1D Price
Change %
SOXL100%
-7.83%
ONTO - SOXL
81%
Closely correlated
-3.55%
ASX - SOXL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
TSM - SOXL
79%
Closely correlated
-2.11%
STM - SOXL
72%
Closely correlated
-2.39%
SLAB - SOXL
67%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
More