ROM
Price
$140.20
Change
-$21.78 (-13.45%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
1.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXL
Price
$182.54
Change
-$80.16 (-30.51%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
19.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ROM vs SOXL

Header iconROM vs SOXL Comparison
Open Charts ROM vs SOXLBanner chart's image
ROM vs SOXL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) vs. Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL)

Key Takeaways

  • ROM provides 2x leveraged exposure to the broad S&P Technology Select Sector Index (approximately 73 holdings), offering diversified tech sector coverage including software, hardware, and semiconductors.
  • SOXL delivers 3x leveraged exposure to the concentrated NYSE Semiconductor Index (30 holdings), targeting pure semiconductor plays with higher sector-specific risk and reward potential.
  • SOXL's net expense ratio of 0.75% is lower than ROM's 0.95%, providing a cost advantage for short-term traders despite greater leverage decay risks.
  • Both ETFs exhibit high volatility due to daily leverage resets, but SOXL's semiconductor focus amplifies sensitivity to AI chip demand and supply chain dynamics.
  • ROM suits investors seeking broader technology diversification, while SOXL appeals to those betting on sustained semiconductor momentum amid AI infrastructure growth.
  • Liquidity is robust for both, with SOXL showing higher average daily volumes supporting active trading strategies.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) offer leveraged exposure to technology-driven growth, making them compelling for investors navigating the AI-fueled market environment. While both target high-beta tech themes, ROM provides 2x daily leverage to the broader technology sector, encompassing software giants and hardware leaders. SOXL, with 3x leverage, zeroes in on semiconductors—the critical backbone of AI infrastructure. These ETFs do not compete directly but represent alternative strategies: ROM for diversified tech rotation, SOXL for concentrated bets on chip demand. Amid surging data center investments and generative AI adoption, comparing their structures helps clarify risk-reward trade-offs in sector exposure and performance dynamics.

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) Overview

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is a leveraged ETF seeking daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to 2x the performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index—a benchmark tracking large-cap U.S. information technology firms from the S&P 500. The underlying index spans industries like software, IT services, semiconductors, and hardware, with approximately 73 holdings as of March 31, 2026. ROM itself holds around 86 positions, including swaps for leverage.

Top holdings as of May 8, 2026, include NVDA (8.71%), AAPL (7.16%), MSFT (5.13%), MU (3.41%), and AVGO (3.39%). Sector allocation is nearly 100% technology, blending megacap platforms with chipmakers. The gross and net expense ratio stands at 0.95%, with quarterly distributions and daily rebalancing via derivatives to maintain leverage. Launched in 2007, ROM exhibits strong liquidity with a 30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.09%.

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) Overview

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) aims for daily results equal to 300% of the NYSE Semiconductor Index (ICESEMIT), a modified float-adjusted, market-cap-weighted gauge of the 30 largest U.S.-listed semiconductor companies. This non-diversified fund holds about 50 positions, primarily swaps and index securities, emphasizing semiconductors (75.81%) and materials/equipment (24.19%) as of March 31, 2026.

Index top holdings include Nvidia (8.41%), Broadcom (8.28%), Micron Technology (7.00%), AMD (6.48%), and Applied Materials (5.85%). Fund holdings reflect similar weights via derivatives. The net expense ratio is 0.75% (gross 0.91%), under a fee waiver through September 2027. Inception in 2010, SOXL uses daily resets for 3x leverage, heightening volatility and compounding effects. It boasts exceptional liquidity, with daily volumes exceeding 46 million shares.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector thrives on innovation cycles, with semiconductors at the forefront amid the AI infrastructure surge. Global chip sales are projected to exceed $1 trillion in 2026, driven by generative AI chips comprising nearly half of revenues despite low unit volume. Data center expansions by hyperscalers fuel demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and advanced GPUs, benefiting semiconductor leaders. Broader tech benefits from cloud computing and enterprise software, but faces risks from interest rate shifts and geopolitical tensions over supply chains (e.g., Taiwan). Capital flows favor AI enablers, with regulatory scrutiny on antitrust and export controls adding caution. Sector risks include cyclical downturns and "memflation," yet macro tailwinds like AI capex persist across market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, semiconductors have outpaced broader technology, propelled by AI chip demand. SOXL, with 3x leverage to this niche, has demonstrated superior relative returns over recent months compared to ROM's 2x tech exposure, reflecting momentum in holdings like NVDA and AVGO. ROM benefits from stable megacaps like AAPL and MSFT, offering smoother volatility profiles during sector rotations. Both exhibit amplified swings—SOXL's higher beta heightens drawdowns in corrections, while ROM provides relative stability. Positioning ties to AI earnings cycles, with semiconductors leading amid data center builds but vulnerable to supply gluts; tech diversification aids ROM in macro shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SOXL due to its structural alignment with surging semiconductor momentum, lower expense ratio, and concentrated exposure to AI chip leaders amid robust sector tailwinds. While ROM offers superior diversification and moderated volatility, SOXL's higher leverage and trend consistency position it probabilistically stronger for capturing near-term upside in data center and memory cycles, assuming sustained AI capex.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ROM vs. SOXL commentary
Jun 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ROM is a Hold and SOXL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOXL has more net assets: 20B vs. ROM (1.4B). SOXL has a higher annual dividend yield than ROM: SOXL (334.309) vs ROM (48.715). ROM was incepted earlier than SOXL: ROM (19 years) vs SOXL (16 years). SOXL (0.75) has a lower expense ratio than ROM (0.95). SOXL has a higher turnover ROM (69.00) vs ROM (69.00).
ROMSOXLROM / SOXL
Gain YTD48.715334.30915%
Net Assets1.4B20B7%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.75127%
Turnover69.00250.0028%
Yield0.140.03415%
Fund Existence19 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ROMSOXL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ROM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVLU42.04-1.07
-2.48%
iShares Edge MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
MMLG36.09-1.17
-3.15%
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF
MSFW28.83-0.94
-3.17%
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay ETF
DAPP19.66-2.05
-9.44%
VanEck Digital Trfmt ETF
BAI45.55-4.94
-9.78%
iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF

ROM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROM has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ROM jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROM
1D Price
Change %
ROM100%
-13.45%
NVDA - ROM
73%
Closely correlated
-6.20%
LRCX - ROM
70%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
AVGO - ROM
69%
Closely correlated
-7.92%
AMAT - ROM
67%
Closely correlated
-9.71%
KLAC - ROM
67%
Closely correlated
-9.47%
More