Investors and traders often compare Roper Technologies (ROP) and Watts Water Technologies (WTS) due to their positions in the broader industrial and technology-enabled manufacturing space. Both companies serve essential end-markets with recurring revenue characteristics, making them relevant for portfolios seeking exposure to steady demand drivers. This comparison appeals to those evaluating relative performance, sector positioning, and momentum within the industrial technology segment, particularly amid evolving economic conditions that influence capital spending and infrastructure needs.
Roper Technologies (ROP) provides software solutions and technology-enabled products primarily in healthcare, industrial, and other diversified markets. The company emphasizes high-margin, recurring revenue streams through its portfolio of vertical software applications. In recent market activity, ROP has maintained a focus on operational discipline and portfolio optimization. First-quarter 2026 results reflected 11% revenue growth to $2.10 billion, supported by enterprise retention rates in the mid-90s and double-digit software bookings expansion. Recent weeks have seen investor attention shift toward the upcoming second-quarter 2026 earnings release scheduled for July 23, 2026, with analysts anticipating moderate EPS growth. Stock behavior has reflected broader market rotation into quality industrial names, with limited volatility tied to macroeconomic data releases.
Watts Water Technologies (WTS) designs, manufactures, and sells water management and flow control products for residential, commercial, and industrial applications. The company benefits from demand tied to infrastructure maintenance, new construction, and regulatory standards for water efficiency. In recent market activity, WTS delivered record first-quarter 2026 results, including net sales of $677.3 million, representing 21% reported growth and 12% organic growth, alongside a 390 basis point improvement in operating margin to 19.6%. The results exceeded analyst expectations on both revenue and adjusted earnings per share. Recent weeks have featured additional positive sentiment following the company's inclusion on TIME’s America’s Best Companies 2026 list, which recognizes performance in employee satisfaction, financial results, and sustainability metrics. Stock performance has shown resilience relative to the S&P 500 on a year-to-date basis.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a platform that offers hundreds of such bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers. Only the most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this curated section, based on factors including strategy alignment, historical performance metrics, and adaptability across varying timeframes. Available bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many demonstrating win rates or risk-adjusted returns in observable ranges that appeal to diverse investor preferences. All bots operate on distinct sets of tickers and employ unique approaches to market participation. For additional details on current trending options, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Roper Technologies (ROP) and Watts Water Technologies (WTS) differ in business model focus, with ROP centered on software and technology platforms that generate high-margin recurring revenue, while WTS emphasizes tangible water infrastructure products with exposure to cyclical construction and maintenance spending. Growth drivers for ROP include software adoption and cross-selling within its vertical markets, whereas WTS benefits from organic volume expansion and margin expansion through product mix and operational efficiency. Recent momentum favors WTS following its strong first-quarter beat, contrasted with ROP’s positioning ahead of its own quarterly update. Risk factors for ROP include integration of acquisitions and software renewal rates, while WTS faces potential pressure from raw material costs and housing market fluctuations. Sector exposure overlaps in industrial applications, yet WTS maintains a narrower water-centric footprint. Market sentiment has reflected WTS’s earnings outperformance and external recognition, with ROP viewed through the lens of earnings visibility and larger enterprise scale.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, organic growth trajectory, and relative positioning in current market conditions, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor Watts Water Technologies (WTS) with moderate probability. The company’s demonstrated first-quarter outperformance and margin expansion provide a clearer near-term catalyst compared to the pre-earnings positioning of Roper Technologies (ROP). Trend consistency and stability metrics appear supportive for WTS, though outcomes remain subject to broader market dynamics and subsequent quarterly results.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ROP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ROP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ROP (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.70% price change this week, while WTS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.33%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.53%.
ROP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
WTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Industrial Machinery (-1.07% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| ROP | WTS | ROP / WTS | |
| Capitalization | 38.8B | 11.5B | 337% |
| EBITDA | 4.29B | 562M | 764% |
| Gain YTD | -11.315 | 25.731 | -44% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.33 | 31.64 | 52% |
| Revenue | 8.28B | 2.56B | 324% |
| Total Cash | 365M | 375M | 97% |
| Total Debt | 11.3B | 198M | 5,707% |
ROP | WTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ROP's Valuation (16) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTS (77) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that ROP’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTS’s over the last 12 months.
WTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for ROP (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that WTS’s stock grew significantly faster than ROP’s over the last 12 months.
WTS's SMR Rating (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ROP (63) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that WTS’s stock grew similarly to ROP’s over the last 12 months.
WTS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ROP (48) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that WTS’s stock grew similarly to ROP’s over the last 12 months.
WTS's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ROP (97) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that WTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ROP’s over the last 12 months.
| ROP | WTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 44% | 14 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 63% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROP has been closely correlated with AME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ROP jumps, then AME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ROP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROP | 100% | +0.70% | ||
| AME - ROP | 75% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| GGG - ROP | 71% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| IEX - ROP | 69% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| OTIS - ROP | 69% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| NDSN - ROP | 68% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTS has been loosely correlated with HLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTS jumps, then HLMN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTS | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| HLMN - WTS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| LECO - WTS | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.43% | ||
| ROP - WTS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SWK - WTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| GRC - WTS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||