Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs SFSLX
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SFSLX
1919 Financial Services C
Price$26.73
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.26M
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SFSLX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and SFSLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. SFSLX (123M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: RPFGX (1.35) vs SFSLX (0.00). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: RPFGX (34 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.27 vs. SFSLX (10.52). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 121.92 vs. SFSLX (40.96).
| RPFGX | SFSLX | RPFGX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.850 | 4.300 | 369% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 123M | 916% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.27 | 10.52 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.79 | 7.43 | 939% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.92 | 40.96 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.14 | 40.37 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement